ADM-636 Law and Administrative Process Entire Course
ADM-636 Law and Administrative Process Entire Course
Follow
Below Link to Download Tutorial
ADM-636
Law and Administrative Process Entire Course
ADM
636 Topic 1: DQ 1
Does the
Administrative Procedure Act define the substantive or procedural aspects of
administrative law? Define and give an example of each. What is administrative
law?
ADM
636 Topic 1: DQ 2
How do
different agencies implement administrative law? How has administrative law
implementation contributed to the growth in the administrative state?
ADM
636 Topic 1 Assignment Administrative Law Implementation, Bureaucracy and
Health Care Reform Essay
Details:
Read the
sidebar “Health Care Reform and Bureaucracy” on page 13.
After
reading the summary and further researching the case, answer, in a paper of
1,500-1,750 words, the following questions:
1.
What is the role of bureaucracy in the implementation of the
Affordable Care Act?
2.
How does the policy implementation of the Affordable Healthcare
Act limit the powers of public administrators?
Prepare
this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide,
located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
In
addition to the required topic readings, include a minimum of three appropriate
and relevant academic sources to support your response.
This
assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the
assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are
required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the
Student Success Center.
ADM
636 Topic 2: DQ 1
How has
the Chevron case changed how Court’s review the actions of federal agency
discretion?
ADM
636 Topic 2: DQ 2
Describe
the relationship between discretion and fairness. Why are the two terms similar
or different in the context of agency actions?
ADM
636 Topic 2 Assignment Agency Discretion and the Concept of Deference Essay
Details:
In a
paper of 1,500-1,750 words, address the following:
1.
Assess deference and the discretion that is afforded in an
agency’s interpretation of its own rule, such as outlined in the Chevron decision.
2.
Use the Elian Gonzales case in Chapter 3 to help explain the
concept of deference and how it was applied in that case.
3.
Assess the benefits and detriments of agency discretion as it
relates to outcomes of administrative decisions.
Prepare
this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide,
located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
In
addition to the required topic readings, include a minimum of three appropriate
and relevant academic sources to support your response.
This
assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the
assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are
required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the
Student Success Center.
ADM
636 Topic 3: DQ 1
In Goldberg
v. Kelly (1970) what principles of due process and equal protection
were violated? Analyze the relationship between cost-benefit analysis and
protective interests. How did the balance between cost-benefit analysis and
protective interests play into the court’s decision? Please reference this
topic’s readings in your response.
ADM 636 Topic 3: DQ 2
How did
the enforcement of the law in the Goldberg case uphold or violate
constitutional due process? Why is this important for public administrators?
ADM
636 Topic 4: DQ 1
Why is
the concept of separation of powers important to administrative law and the
operations of administrative agencies? Please reference this topic’s
readings in your response.
ADM 636 Topic 4: DQ 2
Discuss
the limitations of executive delegation of authority and the legislative
delegation of authority. What is the role of the Judiciary? Why are these
limitations in place? Please reference this topic’s readings in your
response.
ADM
636 Topic 4 Assignment Private Agencies and the Public Interest: The Role of
Delegation Essay
Details:
Your text discusses the case South Dakota v. Department of Interior on page 130. Please read the full appeal that was decided in 2005.
Your text discusses the case South Dakota v. Department of Interior on page 130. Please read the full appeal that was decided in 2005.
In a
paper of 1,500-1,750 words, address the following:
1.
Assess whether this was a constitutional or unconstitutional
delegation of power.
2.
Why was the court involved in this scenario?
3.
Why is this case significant for public administrators in understanding
the delegation doctrine?
Prepare
this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide,
located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
In
addition to the required topic readings, include a minimum of three appropriate
and relevant academic sources to support your response.
This
assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the
assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are
required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the
Student Success Center.
ADM
636 Topic 5: DQ 1
Explain
how evidence can be obtained and used for purposes of enforcing regulatory
rules. What are the constitutional issues surrounding the gathering of evidence
by inspectors?
ADM
636 Topic 5: DQ 2
Parallel
proceedings are allowed in criminal and civil cases. Explain why a Court might
suspend an administrative process to preserve a constitutional or statutory
right? How might this create potential conflicts between the fourth and fifth
amendments?
ADM
636 Topic 6: DQ 1
Define
non-statutory review. Discuss why courts presume that agencies have a review
process in place. Why is this important? Is this a question of fact or a
question of law? Explain by discussing the role of the public manager as
explained in the Denhardt and Denhardt article.
ADM
636 Topic 6: DQ 2
Explain
the process differences between administrative and judicial adjudication. Use
examples of cases from the text to expand your response.
ADM
636 Topic 6 Assignment Administrative Hearings Essay
Details:
In a
paper of 1,250-1,500 words, address the following:
1.
What triggers adjudication under the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA)?
2.
Is stating that the hearing will be “on the record” enough to
trigger adjudication? Why or why not?
3.
Explain each of the components from an administrative to a
judicial hearing. Use examples of cases in the text and two to
three peer-reviewed sources to explain why the components are necessary to
ensure justice.
Prepare
this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide,
located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This
assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment
to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are
required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the
Student Success Center.
ADM
636 Topic 7: DQ 1
What are
some of the limitations of the Freedom of Information Act? Please explain the
relationship between “discovery” and the Freedom of Information Act. Explain
how the case of Walsh v. North exemplifies this relationship. Explain
when it is appropriate for the courts to review a denied request for public
information. Use one of the court cases in Chapter 10 as an example.
ADM
636 Topic 7: DQ 2
Provide
an example of privatization of a traditional government service. Explain how
public information may be limited in the example you provided. What impact does
this limit on information have for society?
ADM
636 Topic 8: DQ 1
In
federal tort claims why is it important to understand if the public
administrator or public worker was acting in an official capacity when
assessing liability? Use a case from Chapter 11 to illustrate this concept.
ADM
636 Topic 8: DQ 2
What is
the proper role of the court in assessing liability of government officers?
Discuss how the U.S. Supreme Court in Filarsky v. Delia analyzed the decision of the 9th Circuit
Court of Appeals.
ADM
636 Topic 8 Assignment Benchmark Assignment – Case Brief: Government Liability
and the Federal Torts Claims Act
Details:
Write a
case brief of 1,000-1,250 words by doing the following:
Discuss
how government officials, when acting within the scope of their official
duties, could be either liable or immune for an alleged tort.
Kirk
v. Shawnee in
Chapter 11 examines the context of federal tort claims act. Read the full case
to brief the tort liability case
Be
certain you include all of the following components in your case brief:
1.
State the issue.
2.
State the rule of law.
3.
Analyze the facts of the case.
4.
Conclude by discussing what the court did.
5.
Reflection. Add a reflection on what happened in the selected
case and how, as a public administrator/manager, you think this ruling would
impact the work of the agency highlighted.
Use the
“Briefing a Case” document to assist you in completing the assignment.
Prepare
this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide,
located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
You are
not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
This
Benchmark Assignment assesses the following Masters of Public Administration
Program competencies:
Competency
4.3: Analyze law and administrative processes relevant to public
administration.
Labels: ADM-636 Law and Administrative Process Entire Course

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home